Family Travel Boards

 

Go Back   Family Travel Boards » Destinations » Teens and Students
LOG INTO FAMILY TRAVEL BOARDS
Thanks for your interest in discussing travel with kids with our global community. If this is your first visit to FTF's family travel bulletin boards, please read the Terms and Conditions of Service (TOS) to understand the rules governing posts to our community boards. Family Travel Forum staff will respond to messages of general interest. If you are concerned about family travel scams and how to avoid them, visit the American Society of Travel Agents or check the Better Business Bureau for information about the travel provider you are interested in, before you purchase travel.

Advertisements

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2009, 12:15 PM   #1
todobigo
 
Status: FTF editor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Should the U. S. Drinking Age Stay at 21?

I just received this press release "25th Anniversary of Age 21 Drinking Law Brings a Changed Mind" -- which of course reminded me how much travel with teens is associated with drinking. In our house of teens, one of the first questions about an out-of-the-country family vacation is "What's the drinking age?" Somehow, our stressed out youth associate a vacation with relaxing with a beer, or whatever.

That's why this news from the non-profit Choose Responsibility organization interested me. I am pasting in the whole release below. Can other parents and teens share their thoughts about this? I think it's a really important issue to raise with kids -- thanks -


25th Anniversary of Age 21 Drinking Law Brings a Changed Mind

WASHINGTON, DC (Vocus/PRWEB) July 23, 2009 – As lawmakers across the country search for effective solutions to the persistent problem of binge drinking by young people, a prominent member of the presidential commission that recommended raising the drinking age to combat dangerous alcohol consumption has now called it “the single most regrettable decision” of his career. The law was signed by President Ronald Reagan 25 years ago this week.

Dr. Morris Chafetz, who founded the National Institute for Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse, said he reluctantly supported the recommendation but that “legal age 21 has not worked.” He is well known for taking on bold scientific claims and so-called experts, and rarely shies away from challenging the accepted norm. Chafetz says the law has resulted in “collateral, off-road damage” that includes thousands of injuries and fatalities that occur off the roadways.

“Legal Age 21 has not worked,” said Chafetz on the 25th anniversary of its enactment. “To be sure, drunk driving fatalities are lower now than they were in 1982. But they are lower in all age groups. And they have declined just as much in Canada, where the age is 18 or 19, as they have in the United States.”

Choose Responsibility (CR) applauded Dr. Chafetz’s courage, and his candor. CR is a national organization that recognizes binge drinking increasingly threatens the lives and well-being of millions of young people and their families and is seeking a new approach to the problem.

“We need to consider new, fresh approaches to a serious problem that has not gotten appreciably better and in some ways has gotten much worse,” Choose Responsibility’s John McCardell said. “Twenty-five more years of the 'success' of this law is simply unacceptable."

Recent research points to the growing number of binge drinkers among college age people, while other populations have seen declines. Unfortunately, the new data do not make clear what policies have contributed to those reductions. While there is no evidence of correlation, let alone solutions, those who oppose any re-examination of the Legal 21 law suggest that what is required is simply more enforcement. Dr. Chafetz adamantly disagreed.

“Enforcement is frustratingly difficult and usually forces the behavior deeper underground, into places where life and health are put at ever greater risk,” said Chafetz. “The 600,000 assaults reported annually, the date rapes, the property damage, the emergency room calls do not in general occur in places visible to the public. They are the inevitable result of what happens when laws do not reflect social or cultural reality.”

McCardell said the biggest obstacle to addressing the binge drinking problem are those who oppose any re-examination of the law who then fail to offer meaningful alternatives, which leaves only the status quo.

Choose Responsibility is a nonprofit organization founded to stimulate informed and dispassionate public discussion about the presence of alcohol in American culture and to consider policies that will effectively empower young adults age 18 to 20 to make mature decisions about the place of alcohol in their own lives. For more information, visit www.chooseresponsibility.org.
__________________
Safe there, safe home!
Kyle
todobigo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 01:21 PM   #2
SpencerBrown
 
Status: Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Don't mess with it!

I may just be old fashioned but I say to leave the drinking age at 21.
SpencerBrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 12:41 AM   #3
bobohed
 
Status: Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5
If we can vote at 18, I see no reason why we can't drink at the same age.
bobohed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 02:27 AM   #4
Ivonka
 
Status: Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 10
I think i'll stick with the age of 21.
Ivonka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

 




Nav Item BG